About Majors.ai
Attorney-led AI consulting and software for law firms.
Dominic “Dom” Majors, Esq.
Active, licensed attorney · Founder of Majors.ai
Majors.ai helps law firms and businesses put artificial intelligence to work on the operational side of practice. We design and build the systems that surround legal work — client intake, information and document collection, document processing, case and matter reporting, task routing, and routine follow-up — so that a firm stops losing hours to messy files, scattered email, and status chasing. The goal is simple: the attorney spends time on the part of practice that cannot be automated, which is the relationship between a lawyer and a client.
Majors.ai was founded by attorney Dom Majors, who practices in multiple jurisdictions and has built legal-technology products including Bankruptcy.ai. Our two services are consulting — AI strategy, workflow and task design, case reporting, migration planning, and team training — and SaaS development, where we build custom AI software and legal-tech products for practices and businesses.
Why Majors.ai exists
Because the work around the work is eating the practice.
Legal practice has quietly become an administrative profession. A matter arrives, and before anyone applies judgment to it, someone re-types a client's information, chases four documents, saves them under a name nobody else will guess, answers the same procedural question for the third time, and writes a status update that will be out of date by morning. None of that is legal work, and all of it is billed in hours a firm cannot get back.
Majors.ai was built by an attorney who felt that pressure inside his own practice. The company exists to move that operational layer onto systems that handle it reliably — and to leave the counsel, the strategy and the client relationship with the lawyer, where the rules and common sense both require it.
Who we serve
Any practice willing to look honestly at its own workflow.
New and growing practices
Firms that want their systems built correctly the first time, before habits harden around spreadsheets and inbox folders.
Established firms
Practices operating for decades, with institutional knowledge worth preserving and processes worth modernizing carefully.
Multi-office and multistate firms
Teams where the same matter passes through several hands and consistency is the hardest thing to maintain.
Businesses outside law
Owners who need the same discipline applied to intake, documents, reporting and follow-up.
How we work
Gradual and parallel — never rip-and-replace.
We do not believe in removing the systems a firm already depends on. A practice cannot pause while a vendor rebuilds its infrastructure, and a team asked to abandon a familiar process overnight will quietly keep using it. So we migrate in stages, running new workflows in parallel with the existing ones.
Your team compares the two side by side on real matters. When the new workflow produces better output more reliably, you move to it; when it does not, we change it before it becomes a habit. Each stage is small enough to understand, verify and reverse. Clients never feel a transition, and nobody on your staff is asked to trust a system they have not tested. Migration is genuinely easier than it has ever been — provided it is sequenced rather than staged as an event.
Ethics and supervision
AI does not give legal advice. Attorneys do.
A lawyer cannot delegate legal advice to a non-lawyer, and software is no exception. Every system we design operates on the work around the advice: gathering information, organizing documents, extracting and summarizing what a reviewer needs, tracking what happens next. The analysis, the recommendation and the responsibility stay with the licensed attorney supervising the matter.
That principle shapes practical decisions: what data a system is permitted to touch, how client confidentiality is preserved, where a human approval is required before anything reaches a client or a court, and what record exists of who reviewed what. We would rather build a narrower system that a bar regulator would find unremarkable than a clever one that puts a license at risk.
The portfolio
Platforms we designed, built and operate.
These are our own products. They are the reason our guidance on intake, documents and attorney review is specific rather than theoretical — each one had to survive real users and real professional obligations.
Bankruptcy.ai
Flagship platform for bankruptcy practice: intake, document organization, readiness review and export to petition software, under attorney supervision.
TaxDebtRelief.ai
Guided information and intake for people facing tax debt, organized for professional review.
DebtHelp.ai
Self-help software. It never collects, holds or disburses funds, and never contacts creditors on a user's behalf.
SchoolYear.ai
The same workflow and information-gathering approach applied outside of legal practice.
AccidentLawyer.ai
Intake and information workflows designed for personal injury practice.